Final signature count: 141

141 signatures toward our 30,000 goal

For millions of Americans with disabilities, an assistance animal is not a pet — it's part of their medical care. A recent federal policy shift is now making it harder for those tenants to keep their animals, and harder to keep their homes.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has reversed longstanding guidance on how landlords must handle assistance animal requests under the Fair Housing Act. The new policy draws sharper lines around which animals and which disabilities qualify for accommodation, raises documentation standards that many people with legitimate conditions cannot meet, and — most critically — signals that HUD will no longer actively enforce these protections.² The Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund calls this a fundamental break from decades of civil rights precedent.²

Who Gets Left Behind

The people most exposed are among the most vulnerable. Individuals living with psychiatric disabilities, chronic illness, and other non-visible conditions have long relied on emotional support animals as part of their treatment. Under the new framework, many of them no longer qualify — not because their needs are less real, but because those needs are harder to document.³

Older adults face particular risk. Many seniors in affordable and subsidized housing depend on companion animals for mental health stability and daily functioning. Housing administrators, now operating without clear federal guidance, are defaulting to denial simply to avoid legal uncertainty.⁴ The result: disabled tenants lose accommodations they were previously guaranteed.

This Is a Housing Crisis, Not a Pet Policy Debate

When a disabled tenant loses the right to keep an assistance animal, the choice is brutal: give up an animal that is part of their care, or give up their home. For low-income renters and seniors on fixed incomes, losing housing is not an inconvenience. It is a health crisis — and often the start of a longer spiral.

The Fair Housing Act has protected disabled tenants' right to reasonable accommodations for more than 35 years. Those protections exist because housing stability and disability rights cannot be separated.

State Laws Can't Fix a Federal Problem

Some states have begun to act. Colorado recently passed legislation to enshrine emotional support animal protections in state law, explicitly designed to fill the gap left by the federal rollback.¹ That matters for Colorado residents — but it doesn't help renters in states without similar laws. Federal fair housing protections were always meant to set a national floor, not leave civil rights to vary by zip code.

HUD and Congress have the authority to restore robust assistance animal guidance, resume active enforcement of fair housing law, and codify these protections so they cannot be quietly reversed again. Disabled tenants across the country are waiting.

Sign the petition now to tell HUD and Congress to restore and protect assistance animal housing rights for disabled renters — before more people lose their homes.