End The Cruel Rule That Lets Bleeding Horses Suffer For Competition

3,535 signatures toward our 30,000 goal

11.783333333333333% Complete

Sponsor: The Animal Rescue Site

The FEI wants to let bleeding horses keep competing — a shocking betrayal of compassion that puts trophies above lives and threatens to turn equestrian sport into a spectacle of suffering.

End The Cruel Rule That Lets Bleeding Horses Suffer For Competition

The Fédération Équestre Internationale (FEI) was founded to protect horses and ensure fair play. But a proposed new rule threatens both. Under this change, horses with visible blood in their mouth or nose would no longer face immediate elimination. Instead, riders could receive a warning and continue competing if a veterinary delegate declares the horse “fit.”1

This shift would replace a clear welfare safeguard with an administrative loophole. The current “blood rule” exists because bleeding is never trivial. It signals tissue damage and pain. To ignore that is to deny the horse’s suffering. The FEI’s proposal would turn compassion into convenience — and horse welfare into a technicality.2

A Step Backward for Welfare

For decades, elimination for bleeding has upheld the idea that competition must never override the welfare of the horse. This rule is not punitive; it is protective. The proposed change, however, moves in the opposite direction. It weakens accountability for riders and officials while normalizing injury as part of sport. The FEI says its “zero-tolerance stance on abuse remains firm,” but this policy contradicts that claim.2

Under the new rule, two warnings within a year would result in a small fine and a temporary suspension. In practice, this means an injured horse could compete, again and again, before any serious consequence is imposed.3 This is not welfare. It is willful blindness — and it risks turning equestrian sport into something the public no longer trusts.

Ethics, Empathy, and Evidence Ignored

The FEI’s proposal rejects the core principles of the Five Domains of Animal Welfare — nutrition, environment, health, behavior, and mental state. Blood is not “minor.” It is a visible wound that reflects physical harm and distress. Permitting horses to continue under rein pressure after such an injury defies every ethical, veterinary, and moral standard in modern sport.1

This change also sends the wrong message to young riders and fans: that winning matters more than welfare. Over 50,000 people have already signed petitions opposing this rollback, urging the FEI to keep “blood = competition over.”4 National federations in Germany and Denmark have also spoken out, warning that the rule “does not benefit equestrian sport and does not take into account the interests of the horse.”2

Horse Sports Must Not Become Blood Sports

Horses cannot speak, but their bodies tell the truth. Blood is pain. Allowing that pain to be dismissed is an abdication of care and leadership. The FEI’s credibility — and the future of every horse on course — depends on drawing the line at welfare.

Sign now to tell the FEI to halt this unethical rule change and uphold the highest standard of horse welfare. Compassion must come before competition.

More on this issue:

  1. Cristina Wilkins, Horses and People (21 October 2025), "The FEI’s Blood Rule: Are We Really Willing to Jump Backwards?"
  2. Becky Murray, Horse & Hound (3 November 2025), "Thousands Sign Petition Against Plan to ‘Weaken’ Blood Rules in Horse Sport"
  3. International Jumping Riders Club, Horse Sport (3 November 2025), "IJRC Responds to FEI Jumping Rules Review"
  4. Dressur-Studien | Fair zum Pferd, Horse Sport (28 October 2025), "No-Blood Rule Petition Attracts 17,000 Supporters"

The Petition

To the Fédération Équestre Internationale (FEI),

The Fédération Équestre Internationale (FEI) is the global guardian of equestrian sport — and with that position comes a solemn duty: to protect the welfare, dignity, and lives of the horses who make this sport possible. Yet the proposed rule change that would allow visibly injured horses — even those bleeding from the mouth or nose — to continue competing represents a grave betrayal of that responsibility.

Under current FEI rules, any visible blood results in immediate elimination. This standard exists for a reason. The presence of blood is an unmistakable sign of pain, injury, or trauma. Downgrading such a warning from elimination to a simple administrative “recorded warning” is an unacceptable step backward. It prioritizes competition over compassion and contradicts the FEI’s own Horse Welfare Code of Conduct.

This proposal also defies the internationally recognized Five Domains of Animal Welfare — Nutrition, Environment, Health, Behavior, and Mental State — all of which require that animals be free from unnecessary pain, fear, or distress. To ignore blood, a visible sign of harm, is to disregard evidence, empathy, and ethics alike. It would legitimize forcing horses to perform through injury and normalize suffering in the name of sport.

Such a rule not only endangers horses but places riders at risk, as an injured or distressed animal cannot perform safely. It sends a dangerous message to competitors, young riders, and the public: that winning matters more than welfare.

We, the undersigned, call on the FEI to immediately halt this unethical rule change and instead strengthen its welfare protections by:

  • Upholding automatic elimination for any horse showing visible blood or injury;
  • Requiring mandatory veterinary examination after any bleeding incident; and
  • Implementing stricter oversight of equipment that can cause oral or nasal trauma.

Horse sports must never become blood sports. Compassion, humanity, and integrity are not optional — they are the foundation upon which trust in this sport stands.

Protecting horses from preventable pain honors not only their athleticism but their sentience. By rejecting this regressive proposal and reinforcing humane standards, the FEI can ensure that equestrian competition remains a partnership built on respect, empathy, and care — securing a safer, more ethical future for horses and humans alike.

Sincerely,