Thank you for signing!

Stop Contaminated Pet Food From Killing Our Pets

247 signatures toward our 30,000 goal

0.8233333333333334% Complete

Sponsor: The Animal Rescue Site

By the time families learn their pet food is contaminated, their dogs and cats are already sick.

A yellow Labrador Retriever holds an empty stainless steel food bowl in its mouth while looking up expectantly in a kitchen.

Millions of Americans read labels, research ingredients, and trust that the pet food they buy is safe. That trust is breaking down. Through 2026, a sustained wave of recalls — driven by Salmonella contamination, nutritional deficiencies, and undisclosed ingredients — has swept across dry kibble, raw food, and specialty diet products sold nationwide.1 The pattern is consistent and alarming: by the time families learn something is wrong, their pets are already sick.

A Recall That Came Too Late

The most recent and serious incident centers on raw dog food from Oma's Pride. The product tested positive for Salmonella, and dogs across multiple states fell ill before any warning reached the public.4 The recall came only after illness reports were documented — meaning the contaminated food was already in homes, already in bowls.2 This is not an isolated failure. It is part of a broader, recurring pattern in the pet food industry.3

The Risk Doesn't Stop at Your Pet

Salmonella in pet food is a household danger, not just a veterinary one. Children, elderly family members, and anyone with a compromised immune system face real health risks from handling contaminated products. Most people don't think twice about reaching into a bag of dog food — and they shouldn't have to.3

The System Has Gaps That Regulators Can Close

The FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine oversees an enormous market — raw diets, prescription formulas, mass-market kibble, and everything in between. The scope of that responsibility is real. But the recurring nature of these incidents points to specific, fixable problems: weak pre-market testing standards, insufficient post-market surveillance, and manufacturer reporting timelines that allow harm to accumulate before action is taken.1,4 The tools to do better exist. Proactive testing, mandatory rapid reporting, and real-time public alerts can all shorten the window between contamination and warning — the window where animals get hurt.

What We're Asking the FDA to Do

This petition calls on the Director of the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine to take four concrete steps: strengthen surveillance of the pet food supply, require rigorous and ongoing manufacturer testing, establish clear accountability standards when safety failures occur, and mandate immediate public notification the moment a confirmed threat enters the supply chain.

Pet owners are not asking for perfection. They are asking for a system that finds problems before their pets pay the price. They make careful choices every time they shop. They deserve regulatory oversight that meets that care.

Sign the petition now to demand that the FDA close the gaps in pet food safety — before more dogs and cats are harmed by contamination that could have been caught in time.

More on this issue:

  1. Staff, Petcalmly (8 April 2026), "Pet Food Recall 2026: Urgent Updates Every Owner Must Know."
  2. Staff, Newsweek (17 August 2026), "Dog Food Salmonella Outbreak: Map Shows States Hit by Recall."
  3. Staff, Fast Company (17 August 2026), "Pet food recall 2026: dogs get sick in latest US salmonella scare."
  4. News Desk, Food Safety News (14 August 2026), "Dog food recalled because of illnesses."

The Petition

To the Director of the Center for Veterinary Medicine, United States Food and Drug Administration,

We are writing on behalf of the millions of Americans who share their homes and lives with cats and dogs — and who are losing confidence that the food they buy for those animals is safe.

2026 has seen a troubling series of pet food recalls driven by Salmonella contamination, nutritional deficiencies, and undisclosed ingredients. The most recent involves raw dog food from Oma's Pride, which tested positive for Salmonella after dogs in multiple states had already become ill. The recall came only after documented illness reports. By the time families received any warning, the contaminated product had already been in their homes and in their pets' bowls. This sequence — harm first, notification second — is not an isolated failure. It reflects a recurring pattern across the pet food industry.

The consequences extend beyond animals. Salmonella in pet food poses genuine health risks to the humans who handle it, particularly children, elderly individuals, and anyone who is immunocompromised. This is a household safety issue, not only a veterinary one.

We recognize that the Center for Veterinary Medicine oversees an enormous and diverse market, from raw diets to prescription formulas to mass-market dry food. The scale of that responsibility is real. But recurring contamination events point to specific, addressable gaps: insufficient pre-market testing standards, limited post-market surveillance, and manufacturer reporting timelines that allow harm to accumulate before action is taken.

Compassion for animals is one of the most broadly shared values in this country. Pet owners are not asking for perfection — they are asking for a system that catches problems before their pets pay the price. They read labels, make careful choices, and trust that regulatory oversight is working on their behalf. Right now, that trust is being tested.

We respectfully call on the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine to strengthen pet food surveillance, require rigorous and ongoing manufacturer testing, establish clear accountability standards when safety failures occur, and mandate rapid public notification the moment a confirmed threat enters the supply chain.

These actions will ensure a safer, healthier future for the animals and families who depend on your leadership.

Sincerely,