Can Eating Yogurt Lower Your Risk of Type 2 Diabetes?
Guest Contributor
With type 2 diabetes (T2D) affecting over 12 percent of U.S. adults and rising steadily, the search for practical, everyday strategies to reduce risk has never been more urgent. In that context, yogurt has emerged as a surprisingly promising ally. A recent article in The Journal of Nutrition outlines the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) 2024 approval of a qualified health claim linking regular yogurt consumption with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. While the evidence is observational and not definitive, the FDA’s decision marks a significant step in translating nutrition science into actionable public health guidance. For those exploring food-based ways to support metabolic health, yogurt may be worth a closer look.

The FDA’s review process, which began in 2018, evaluated 140 scientific references before selecting 28 observational studies deemed rigorous enough to support the health claim. These studies included more than 860,000 participants across various countries and consistently showed that people who ate yogurt regularly had a lower risk of developing T2D. The strongest evidence came from nine high-quality prospective cohort studies, where increased yogurt intake was associated with a risk reduction ranging from 11 to 40 percent. These findings held across different demographics and yogurt types, though some variation was noted based on fat content and gender.
The FDA’s qualified health claim now allows yogurt products that meet specific nutritional standards to carry the message: “Eating yogurt regularly, at least two cups (three servings) per week, may reduce risk of type 2 diabetes according to limited scientific evidence.” This applies to all yogurt products that meet FDA identity standards, including drinkable varieties. Importantly, the claim is carefully worded to reflect the nature of the evidence—observational, not causal—and does not apply to yogurts that exceed disqualifying thresholds for fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, or sodium.
I found this detail striking: despite yogurt’s potential health benefits, average consumption in the U.S. remains surprisingly low. National data show that Americans consume only about 0.1 cup of yogurt per day on average, and just 5 percent of adults eat it regularly. This is in stark contrast to the recommended dairy intake levels, which only 12.5 percent of Americans meet. Given yogurt’s positive associations with taste, health, and probiotics, there appears to be untapped potential for increasing its presence in the American diet.
Yogurt’s nutritional profile may help explain its protective role. It is a source of calcium, B vitamins, potassium, and often vitamin D. Its fermentation process enhances nutrient bioavailability and introduces probiotics, which may improve gut health and reduce inflammation—factors linked to better insulin sensitivity. Additionally, yogurt’s protein content supports satiety, muscle maintenance, and bone health. Some researchers also speculate that yogurt’s natural acidity could influence how the body absorbs key nutrients, though this area requires further study.
One of the article’s key takeaways is the importance of practical, consumer-friendly dietary guidance. While large-scale studies like the Diabetes Prevention Program have shown the effectiveness of lifestyle changes—including diet and physical activity—in reducing T2D risk, translating those findings into everyday choices remains a challenge. The FDA’s yogurt claim contributes to a growing movement that positions food as a tool for disease prevention. Within these “food is medicine” initiatives, yogurt offers a culturally adaptable, nutrient-dense option that aligns with current dietary guidelines—especially when consumed in plain or low-sugar forms.
However, the article also emphasizes the limitations of the evidence. All supporting studies were observational, meaning they can identify associations but not prove cause and effect. No randomized controlled trials have directly evaluated whether yogurt consumption prevents type 2 diabetes. The FDA acknowledged this in its decision, noting that while the evidence is credible, it remains limited. The agency also cautioned against applying the claim to high-sugar yogurts, although it did not set explicit sugar or fat thresholds beyond existing disqualifying nutrient limits.
Another layer to consider is the funding behind the research. The article and the symposium it was based on were supported by Danone North America, and several authors are affiliated with Danone, the National Dairy Council, or the International Food Information Council. While this does not invalidate the findings, it underscores the importance of transparency and critical evaluation when interpreting industry-funded research.
Still, the potential public health implications are notable. With nearly 98 million Americans living with prediabetes and one in five people with diabetes remaining undiagnosed, even small dietary shifts could make a meaningful difference. Encouraging yogurt consumption—particularly plain, low-sugar varieties—could serve as a simple, accessible step toward improving metabolic health. Health professionals can play a key role here, helping individuals incorporate yogurt into culturally appropriate meals and snacks while reinforcing its potential benefits.
Ultimately, the FDA’s decision to approve a qualified health claim for yogurt and type 2 diabetes risk reflects a broader trend toward food-based solutions in chronic disease prevention. While more research is needed, especially randomized controlled trials, the current evidence supports yogurt’s inclusion in a balanced, nutrient-rich diet. As public awareness grows and more products carry the new claim, yogurt may become a more prominent player in the fight against type 2 diabetes.