For many autistic adults, navigating nonverbal communication feels like decoding an unwritten language in real time. A recent study published in PLOS ONE sheds light on just how mentally exhausting this process can be. Drawing from 362 firsthand accounts on the autism-focused forum WrongPlanet.net, researchers explored the lived experiences of autistic individuals as they interpret—and are expected to perform—nonverbal cues like eye contact, facial expressions, tone of voice, and gestures. This study brings new insight into the cognitive toll of nonverbal communication and the mutual misunderstandings that often result, a phenomenon known as the Double Empathy Problem.

One of the key findings is that many autistic adults experience nonverbal communication as an overwhelming multitasking challenge. Several participants described trying to speak while simultaneously managing eye contact and facial expressions as “just too much going on.” Others expressed frustration that nonverbal cues are frequently misinterpreted and wished people would simply say what they mean. These sentiments highlight the disconnect that can occur when neurotypical expectations are applied to interactions with autistic individuals.

The study also emphasizes that communication breakdowns are not one-sided. The Double Empathy Problem refers to the mutual difficulty both autistic and non-autistic people may have in understanding each other’s communication styles. Misinterpretations can occur in both directions, yet societal expectations often place the burden of adaptation solely on autistic individuals. As co-author Dr. Steven Kapp noted, this research challenges the notion that communication difficulties stem only from the autistic side. Instead, it calls for a shared responsibility in fostering understanding.

What I found particularly striking is how some autistic adults cope with these challenges. The study revealed that many adopt compensatory strategies to manage nonverbal expectations. Some take acting classes or mimic characters from television shows to learn and replicate socially accepted gestures. Others choose to communicate in writing, where the pressure to interpret or display body language is significantly reduced. These strategies reflect both the creativity and resilience of the autistic community in navigating a world not built with their communication needs in mind.

Authenticity emerged as a powerful theme throughout the discussions. Many participants expressed a preference for being true to their natural communication style rather than masking or mimicking neurotypical behaviors. Forcing eye contact or smiling when it doesn’t feel natural was often described as draining and unsustainable. The study’s lead researcher, PhD candidate Holly Radford from the University of Portsmouth, emphasized that nonverbal communication can feel like “decoding a complex, unwritten language in real time.” Her dual perspective as both a researcher and an autistic person added depth and empathy to the study’s approach.

The research team, which included both autistic and non-autistic scholars, offers practical advice for more inclusive communication. These recommendations include using clear language, allowing extra time for responses, and asking about individual communication preferences. For example, rather than relying on facial expressions to convey emotion, it can be helpful to state feelings explicitly. Similarly, checking in to confirm understanding instead of assuming someone has grasped a nonverbal cue can prevent confusion and foster better interactions.

These strategies are not only considerate but essential for creating environments where everyone can communicate effectively. Whether in healthcare, education, the workplace, or personal relationships, recognizing and respecting diverse communication styles can lead to stronger, more respectful connections. As co-author Bronte Reidinger pointed out, the communication preferences and adaptations developed by autistic adults have broader implications for inclusive social interactions across many settings.

The study also highlights the variability among autistic individuals in how they produce and interpret nonverbal cues. There is no one-size-fits-all approach, which reinforces the importance of personalized communication strategies. Some may find direct verbal communication most comfortable, while others might prefer written exchanges or specific, familiar gestures. The key is to ask and adapt rather than assume.

Ultimately, the research advocates for a cultural shift in how communication is approached. Rather than expecting autistic people to constantly adapt to neurotypical norms, the responsibility should be shared. Inclusive communication is not about lowering standards but about broadening them to accommodate the full spectrum of human interaction. This shift has the potential to reduce social anxiety, prevent miscommunication, and improve quality of life for autistic individuals.

In a world where so much is conveyed through tone, gesture, and expression, it’s easy to overlook how much effort it can take for someone to participate in a conversation. This study offers a timely reminder that communication is a two-way street—and that understanding begins with listening, not just to words, but to the diverse ways people express themselves.

Read more at neurosciencenews.com