Flea and tick prevention has long been a non-negotiable part of caring for dogs and cats. Yet growing evidence shows that certain medications, particularly those in the isoxazoline class, carry risks that pet owners cannot ignore. Products such as Bravecto, NexGard, Simparica, Credelio, and Revolution Plus have been linked to seizures, tremors, and ataxia in animals—even in those with no prior neurological history, according to the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Neurologic reactions have occurred in animals with no prior seizure history after using flea and tick medications.

FDA Warnings and Label Updates

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued alerts beginning in 2018, cautioning veterinarians and pet owners about potential neurological side effects. Reports described pets developing seizures, loss of coordination, and muscle tremors after being treated with isoxazoline products. In response, the FDA required manufacturers to add clearer warnings to product labels so owners could make better-informed decisions.

While the agency emphasizes that these preventives remain effective for the majority of pets, the warning highlights a critical point: neurological side effects may occur even in healthy animals without a prior history of seizures.

Adverse Event Reports and Survey Data

The scope of the issue becomes clearer in post-market data. By 2018, the FDA had already received more than 5,000 adverse event reports tied to isoxazoline preventives, including cases of seizures and tremors, according to the AVMA. A large-scale survey known as Project Jake later revealed that two-thirds of dogs treated with these medications experienced some form of adverse reaction, ranging from mild tremors to death.

Interestingly, data reported in Europe showed significantly higher rates of seizures and deaths compared to U.S. records, suggesting differences in reporting or monitoring standards.

Isoxazoline flea and tick products are linked to seizures, tremors, and ataxia in pets.

The Veterinary Dilemma

Veterinarians face a difficult balance. In parts of the world, tick paralysis is life-threatening, and oral preventives have dramatically reduced fatalities. In Australia, for example, oral isoxazolines are considered a breakthrough for preventing paralysis tick cases, saving countless animal lives despite the neurological risks, reports Walkerville Vet.

For dogs living outside high-risk tick zones, the equation changes. The benefits may not outweigh the potential dangers, particularly for pets with a history of seizures. Some veterinarians recommend avoiding these drugs in such cases and considering topical alternatives, even if they offer slightly less protection.

Recognizing Symptoms of Toxicity

Side effects from flea and tick preventives can appear within hours. Signs include excessive drooling, agitation, tremors, difficulty walking, vomiting, and in severe cases, seizures or death. If an owner suspects toxicity, immediate veterinary care is essential, as supportive treatments can prevent escalation.

According to PetMD, there is no antidote for isoxazoline poisoning, but interventions such as IV fluids, seizure medication, and hospitalization can save lives.

Household insecticides can compound toxicity risks.

Safe Use and Alternatives

The FDA continues to state that isoxazoline products are safe and effective for most pets, but owners are urged to discuss their animal’s medical history before use. Caution is especially important in multi-pet households to avoid accidental dosing errors. Pet owners should never split doses, apply dog products to cats, or use multiple preventives simultaneously, as this increases the risk of poisoning, PetMD reports.

Some advocates recommend exploring natural alternatives, such as cedar oil sprays, diatomaceous earth, or homemade repellents, particularly when parasite risk is low, The Animal Keeper reports. While these methods may not offer complete protection, they provide an option for concerned owners.

Weighing Risk Against Reward

Isoxazoline flea and tick products represent a paradox in veterinary care. On one hand, they provide unmatched protection against parasites that spread life-threatening diseases. On the other, mounting evidence shows they can cause neurological harm in a significant number of pets.

For now, veterinarians and owners must weigh the individual risks and benefits carefully. Vigilant monitoring, honest discussions about medical history, and awareness of safer alternatives can help protect pets from both parasites and preventable suffering.

Click below to make a difference.